Recipients with at least three transaction rows, ranked by absolute net obligations. This is an agency ranking; a recipient’s profile shows its activity across all agencies.
WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSIONSP9FP3K5LZS4
$500,000
1
4
0.12%
MBP-AECOM JOINT VENTURETP5LJ5HJ1CL9
$497,550
7
7
0.12%
COLUMBIA GAS OF VIRGINIA, INC.DGLYK2CXGKV9
$495,000
1
3
0.11%
CHO, BENN, HOLBACK & ASSOCIATES, INC.C2LRJ2F2AFM3
$480,424
5
8
0.11%
Net shares divide the recipient’s signed net obligation by the agency’s net total. Negative adjustments may make a share negative or greater than 100%. The displayed recipients may not add up to the total.
How concentrated are these contracts?
Recipient concentration (HHI): 188.4 out of 10,000. Calculated using all recipient identities in this agency, including recipients not listed above, and absolute net obligation shares.
Obligations record commitments and adjustments. They are not cash payments, total contract ceilings or a rating of supplier performance. Open the official service for updated award-level records.
A closer look at Smithsonian Institution contracts
Reading the Net obligations column
In the 99 numeric rows displayed in this table, Net obligations ranges from 495,000 (COLUMBIA GAS OF VIRGINIA, INC.DGLYK2CXGKV9) to 28,268,500 (UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMFA2CSSMMA35). The difference is 27,773,500 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.
Federal spending research
Before you decide, check these points against the current source.
Things to check
Match the recipient identifier, agency and fiscal year.
Keep obligations, outlays and award values separate.
Read source dates and coverage before comparing recipients or agencies.