Recipients with at least three transaction rows, ranked by absolute net obligations. This is an agency ranking; a recipient’s profile shows its activity across all agencies.
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS NICHOLS INSTITUTE INCHRPJEFM6Z6B3
$2,605
2
4
0.00%
ANNE MEREDITH DALTONH9J7H1N74XW9
$1,776
1
3
0.00%
ANTHONY S NJIEU9W5SFPVPY58
−$1
2
3
-0.00%
CENTRE LAW AND CONSULTING, LLCNEE3HMTVJGN7
$0
2
3
0.00%
Net shares divide the recipient’s signed net obligation by the agency’s net total. Negative adjustments may make a share negative or greater than 100%. The displayed recipients may not add up to the total.
How concentrated are these contracts?
Recipient concentration (HHI): 1476.2 out of 10,000. Calculated using all recipient identities in this agency, including recipients not listed above, and absolute net obligation shares.
Obligations record commitments and adjustments. They are not cash payments, total contract ceilings or a rating of supplier performance. Open the official service for updated award-level records.
In the 45 numeric rows displayed in this table, Awards ranges from 1 (DIDLAKE INCYMZ1PCB5LEM9, DELOITTE CONSULTING LLPCKV2L9GZKJK3, IGNYTE GROUP INCTZ5JY14NKUK6) to 80 (MCKESSON CORPORATIONS1RUKWWRYFL6). The difference is 79 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.
Federal spending research
Before you decide, check these points against the current source.
Things to check
Match the recipient identifier, agency and fiscal year.
Keep obligations, outlays and award values separate.
Read source dates and coverage before comparing recipients or agencies.