Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Filters are query state (noindex). One canonical URL: /agencies/045-equal-employment-opportunity-commission

Observed amount in the data

$9,551,264

78 distinct awards · 102 actions · 68 recipients in this sample. FY in loaded set: 2025.

Data loaded: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Snapshot: 2026-08-24-part-00. First published snapshot on this URL. Loaded-set figures have not changed versus a previous snapshot because none existed.

How this agency compares

These figures are calculated, not copied from the source. They use 833150 money records in the sample. Percent vs average = (this − mean of qualified hubs) / |mean| × 100. Similar hubs = 4 nearest by log10(|obligation|) and log10(award_count). HHI = sum of squared |obligation| shares × 10,000 among recipients in this cell.

Metric	This hub	Loaded-set average	% vs average	Similar-hub average	% vs similar
Obligation (USD)	$9,551,264	$2,784,406,393	-99.7%	$9,953,558	-4.0%
Awards	78	12802.8	-99.4%	87.2	-10.6%
Recipient HHI (calculated)	1119.2	1572.4	-28.8%	1136.7	-1.5%

Similar hubs (similar spend / size)

Consumer Product Safety Commission — $9,262,252 · 88 awards · HHI 1615.6
U.S. International Development Finance Corporation — $9,431,915 · 60 awards · HHI 580.9
Export-Import Bank of the United States — $10,221,119 · 101 awards · HHI 1336.2
Peace Corps — $10,898,947 · 100 awards · HHI 1014

Recipients above and below this agency’s average

Vs loaded-set: below loaded-set average. Vs similar: below similar-hub average.

Good/bad here means listed recipients above/below the average obligation of recipients shown on this hub (min 3 rows). Not a performance rating of the agency. Listed-recipient average obligation (calculated on this hub’s min-3 list): $464,899.

Recipients above the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
LAMB INFORMATICS LIMITED	`V89PNRJ7KAN7`	$1,890,128	7
IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC	`Q2M4FYALZJ89`	$1,099,222	5
REGAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP	`PJ2BS3KYWKS5`	$723,358	3

Recipients below the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES LLC	`GEYFS4D96R55`	−$157,438	3
NEW YORK CITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION	`GMWEJTL68N56`	−$23,890	3
BRECK INC	`JPU2X6ZPWN86`	$27,911	3
RELX INC.	`LKAAJG8KK4U1`	$71,236	4
AINS, LLC	`NEFMH93JD5J6`	$88,668	6

Other useful rankings

Ranked tables live on this hub URL only. Not a new URL family.

Most dollars

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
LAMB INFORMATICS LIMITED	`V89PNRJ7KAN7`	$1,890,128	7
IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC	`Q2M4FYALZJ89`	$1,099,222	5
REGAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP	`PJ2BS3KYWKS5`	$723,358	3
VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES LLC	`GEYFS4D96R55`	−$157,438	3
AINS, LLC	`NEFMH93JD5J6`	$88,668	6
RELX INC.	`LKAAJG8KK4U1`	$71,236	4
BRECK INC	`JPU2X6ZPWN86`	$27,911	3
NEW YORK CITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION	`GMWEJTL68N56`	−$23,890	3

Most award rows

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
LAMB INFORMATICS LIMITED	`V89PNRJ7KAN7`	$1,890,128	7
AINS, LLC	`NEFMH93JD5J6`	$88,668	6
IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC	`Q2M4FYALZJ89`	$1,099,222	5
RELX INC.	`LKAAJG8KK4U1`	$71,236	4
REGAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP	`PJ2BS3KYWKS5`	$723,358	3
VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES LLC	`GEYFS4D96R55`	−$157,438	3
BRECK INC	`JPU2X6ZPWN86`	$27,911	3
NEW YORK CITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION	`GMWEJTL68N56`	−$23,890	3

Largest share of listed recipients (calculated)

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)	Share of listed
LAMB INFORMATICS LIMITED	`V89PNRJ7KAN7`	$1,890,128	7	46.31%
IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC	`Q2M4FYALZJ89`	$1,099,222	5	26.93%
REGAN TECHNOLOGIES CORP	`PJ2BS3KYWKS5`	$723,358	3	17.72%
VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES LLC	`GEYFS4D96R55`	−$157,438	3	3.86%
AINS, LLC	`NEFMH93JD5J6`	$88,668	6	2.17%
RELX INC.	`LKAAJG8KK4U1`	$71,236	4	1.75%
BRECK INC	`JPU2X6ZPWN86`	$27,911	3	0.68%
NEW YORK CITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION	`GMWEJTL68N56`	−$23,890	3	0.59%

Top recipients — observed federal_action_obligation in this sample

Source, date, method

Coverage status: sample — SAMPLE of the first CSV member, using only R2 chunk part-00 (250 MiB). The member continues into later parts. These are not full-archive national totals.

Data collected: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Data rechecked: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Archive date: 2026-08-18.

Freshness: held snapshot; this page does not imply live or complete national coverage.

Source: USAspending.gov Award Data Archive · file FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806.zip · member FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806_1.csv.

Method: Sum federal_action_obligation by awarding_agency_code x US fiscal year of action_date (FY starts 1 October). Award counts are distinct contract_award_unique_key values in this sample. Deobligations (negative) are included. Min-N: agency x FY page only if award_count >= 10 or |obligation| >= 10000000. Recipient lists require at least 3 transaction rows in this sample. Recipient award_count on lists is transaction rows, labelled as such.

Rows used: 833150 money records. Amounts are US dollars. All percentages use this loaded sample only.

Derived from USAspending.gov (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service). U.S. government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. 105). This site is not the official USAspending search and is not endorsed by Treasury or OMB.

Compose a report (good slice) · bad slice · PDF most-dollars

Questions this page can answer

Read the money with its boundaries intact

What does the amount represent?

It is the summed federal contract obligation observed in the labelled USAspending sample and period—not a complete government-spending total.

Who awarded and received it?

Use agency names, recipient identifiers, fiscal year and transaction counts together; names alone can merge unrelated entities.

Can two figures be compared?

Only compare figures built from the same sample, period and measure, with the record count visible.

What should I check next?

Open USAspending for the current complete record before relying on a figure.