Department of Justice

Filters are query state (noindex). One canonical URL: /agencies/015-department-of-justice

Observed amount in the data

$1,673,980,676

11,415 distinct awards · 12,815 actions · 2,855 recipients in this sample. FY in loaded set: 2025.

Data loaded: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Snapshot: 2026-08-24-part-00. First published snapshot on this URL. Loaded-set figures have not changed versus a previous snapshot because none existed.

How this agency compares

These figures are calculated, not copied from the source. They use 833150 money records in the sample. Percent vs average = (this − mean of qualified hubs) / |mean| × 100. Similar hubs = 4 nearest by log10(|obligation|) and log10(award_count). HHI = sum of squared |obligation| shares × 10,000 among recipients in this cell.

Metric	This hub	Loaded-set average	% vs average	Similar-hub average	% vs similar
Obligation (USD)	$1,673,980,676	$2,784,406,393	-39.9%	$2,385,456,688	-29.8%
Awards	11,415	12802.8	-10.8%	7627.5	+49.7%
Recipient HHI (calculated)	162.8	1572.4	-89.6%	129.8	+25.4%

Similar hubs (similar spend / size)

Department of the Interior — $1,771,007,064 · 6454 awards · HHI 121.6
Department of Agriculture — $2,306,153,660 · 10477 awards · HHI 41.9
Department of Transportation — $2,163,323,085 · 4368 awards · HHI 189.2
Department of State — $3,301,342,945 · 9211 awards · HHI 166.6

Recipients above and below this agency’s average

Vs loaded-set: below loaded-set average. Vs similar: below similar-hub average.

Good/bad here means listed recipients above/below the average obligation of recipients shown on this hub (min 3 rows). Not a performance rating of the agency. Listed-recipient average obligation (calculated on this hub’s min-3 list): $36,816,545.

Recipients above the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC	`TWVGJRMK6Z78`	$149,991,184	4
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC	`JCBMLGPE6Z71`	$65,559,845	18
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY	`J9WWNK22SHT8`	$50,685,183	4
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC	`C47BNA8GM833`	$50,544,934	17
ECS FEDERAL, LLC	`XYB4JU4PA6T4`	$49,965,816	26
THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC	`UER4AJLUB8D5`	$49,179,340	72
BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.	`LX3BSV6NNW58`	$43,889,771	14

Recipients below the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
SOS INTERNATIONAL LLC	`L3VCKMD7J585`	$15,275,000	3
GUIDEHOUSE INC.	`N9NJK877QJK9`	$18,635,303	20
PAE LABAT-ANDERSON LLC	`FESKMKCANSH3`	$18,883,735	24
V3GATE, LLC	`J4KHM5JY79E3`	$20,120,417	46
NETWORK DESIGNS, INC.	`LCT9TCMAMQ11`	$20,228,372	5
CELERITY GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC	`K4V5LZ9H16G5`	$20,304,505	5
M. C. DEAN, INC.	`RD55NEXJ5EW4`	$20,307,194	47
NAPHCARE LLC	`GB3CE4QXH6A4`	$21,288,982	400

Other useful rankings

Ranked tables live on this hub URL only. Not a new URL family.

Most dollars

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC	`TWVGJRMK6Z78`	$149,991,184	4
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC	`JCBMLGPE6Z71`	$65,559,845	18
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY	`J9WWNK22SHT8`	$50,685,183	4
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC	`C47BNA8GM833`	$50,544,934	17
ECS FEDERAL, LLC	`XYB4JU4PA6T4`	$49,965,816	26
THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC	`UER4AJLUB8D5`	$49,179,340	72
BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.	`LX3BSV6NNW58`	$43,889,771	14
CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL	`E5E6SMMJYPL3`	$30,377,947	33

Most award rows

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
NAPHCARE LLC	`GB3CE4QXH6A4`	$21,288,982	400
THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC	`UER4AJLUB8D5`	$49,179,340	72
M. C. DEAN, INC.	`RD55NEXJ5EW4`	$20,307,194	47
V3GATE, LLC	`J4KHM5JY79E3`	$20,120,417	46
CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL	`E5E6SMMJYPL3`	$30,377,947	33
ECS FEDERAL, LLC	`XYB4JU4PA6T4`	$49,965,816	26
PAE LABAT-ANDERSON LLC	`FESKMKCANSH3`	$18,883,735	24
GUIDEHOUSE INC.	`N9NJK877QJK9`	$18,635,303	20

Largest share of listed recipients (calculated)

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)	Share of listed
BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC	`TWVGJRMK6Z78`	$149,991,184	4	20.37%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC	`JCBMLGPE6Z71`	$65,559,845	18	8.9%
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY	`J9WWNK22SHT8`	$50,685,183	4	6.88%
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC	`C47BNA8GM833`	$50,544,934	17	6.86%
ECS FEDERAL, LLC	`XYB4JU4PA6T4`	$49,965,816	26	6.79%
THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC	`UER4AJLUB8D5`	$49,179,340	72	6.68%
BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES INC.	`LX3BSV6NNW58`	$43,889,771	14	5.96%
CACI, LLC - COMMERCIAL	`E5E6SMMJYPL3`	$30,377,947	33	4.13%

Top recipients — observed federal_action_obligation in this sample

Source, date, method

Coverage status: sample — SAMPLE of the first CSV member, using only R2 chunk part-00 (250 MiB). The member continues into later parts. These are not full-archive national totals.

Data collected: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Data rechecked: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Archive date: 2026-08-18.

Freshness: held snapshot; this page does not imply live or complete national coverage.

Source: USAspending.gov Award Data Archive · file FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806.zip · member FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806_1.csv.

Method: Sum federal_action_obligation by awarding_agency_code x US fiscal year of action_date (FY starts 1 October). Award counts are distinct contract_award_unique_key values in this sample. Deobligations (negative) are included. Min-N: agency x FY page only if award_count >= 10 or |obligation| >= 10000000. Recipient lists require at least 3 transaction rows in this sample. Recipient award_count on lists is transaction rows, labelled as such.

Rows used: 833150 money records. Amounts are US dollars. All percentages use this loaded sample only.

Derived from USAspending.gov (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service). U.S. government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. 105). This site is not the official USAspending search and is not endorsed by Treasury or OMB.

Compose a report (good slice) · bad slice · PDF most-dollars

Questions this page can answer

Read the money with its boundaries intact

What does the amount represent?

It is the summed federal contract obligation observed in the labelled USAspending sample and period—not a complete government-spending total.

Who awarded and received it?

Use agency names, recipient identifiers, fiscal year and transaction counts together; names alone can merge unrelated entities.

Can two figures be compared?

Only compare figures built from the same sample, period and measure, with the record count visible.

What should I check next?

Open USAspending for the current complete record before relying on a figure.