Department of Agriculture

Filters are query state (noindex). One canonical URL: /agencies/012-department-of-agriculture

Observed amount in the data

$2,306,153,660

10,477 distinct awards · 11,754 actions · 4,174 recipients in this sample. FY in loaded set: 2025.

Data loaded: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Snapshot: 2026-08-24-part-00. First published snapshot on this URL. Loaded-set figures have not changed versus a previous snapshot because none existed.

How this agency compares

These figures are calculated, not copied from the source. They use 833150 money records in the sample. Percent vs average = (this − mean of qualified hubs) / |mean| × 100. Similar hubs = 4 nearest by log10(|obligation|) and log10(award_count). HHI = sum of squared |obligation| shares × 10,000 among recipients in this cell.

Metric	This hub	Loaded-set average	% vs average	Similar-hub average	% vs similar
Obligation (USD)	$2,306,153,660	$2,784,406,393	-17.2%	$2,227,413,442	+3.5%
Awards	10,477	12802.8	-18.2%	7862	+33.3%
Recipient HHI (calculated)	41.9	1572.4	-97.3%	160.1	-73.8%

Similar hubs (similar spend / size)

Department of Justice — $1,673,980,676 · 11415 awards · HHI 162.8
Department of Transportation — $2,163,323,085 · 4368 awards · HHI 189.2
Department of State — $3,301,342,945 · 9211 awards · HHI 166.6
Department of the Interior — $1,771,007,064 · 6454 awards · HHI 121.6

Recipients above and below this agency’s average

Vs loaded-set: below loaded-set average. Vs similar: above similar-hub average.

Good/bad here means listed recipients above/below the average obligation of recipients shown on this hub (min 3 rows). Not a performance rating of the agency. Listed-recipient average obligation (calculated on this hub’s min-3 list): $24,773,389.

Recipients above the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC	`WN8JFVZTBCA5`	$57,342,653	5
TYSON FOODS INC.	`DX7AU4JMLPC7`	$43,492,439	27
CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC.	`HJZEDT4S8LT5`	$35,013,306	7
HIGH LINER FOODS (USA), INCORPORATED	`ZQXGNMNBELK7`	$34,284,339	6
WOLFTEK MISSION GROUP, LLC	`DVB4FP2XNLJ5`	$33,104,919	5
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.	`LL22S1ELLY93`	$27,750,000	9

Recipients below the listed average

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP	`QGUQWSU5AHB4`	$15,686,576	19
CRIDER, INC.	`VKK6BGN5BDH3`	$16,081,091	15
DEL MONTE FOODS CORPORATION II INC.	`VFHFFVVLQYF7`	$16,664,542	14
CHERRY MEAT PACKERS, INC	`VKTSH6PAV4N4`	$16,748,453	9
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION	`SQNWTNLT4KL1`	$16,928,431	8
BRINK BROTHERS INC.	`PD4TKBLMUUN5`	$17,647,097	31
PACIFIC COAST PRODUCERS	`RNUGGJVG1RK8`	$17,776,047	17
HORIZON MARKETING, INC.	`KKUMBGM4CJG1`	$18,957,888	12

Other useful rankings

Ranked tables live on this hub URL only. Not a new URL family.

Most dollars

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC	`WN8JFVZTBCA5`	$57,342,653	5
TYSON FOODS INC.	`DX7AU4JMLPC7`	$43,492,439	27
CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC.	`HJZEDT4S8LT5`	$35,013,306	7
HIGH LINER FOODS (USA), INCORPORATED	`ZQXGNMNBELK7`	$34,284,339	6
WOLFTEK MISSION GROUP, LLC	`DVB4FP2XNLJ5`	$33,104,919	5
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.	`LL22S1ELLY93`	$27,750,000	9
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC	`MNALR8D818N7`	$23,500,000	4
CAVINESS BEEF PACKERS, LIMITED	`JMJGND1L1373`	$22,765,991	22

Most award rows

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)
BRINK BROTHERS INC.	`PD4TKBLMUUN5`	$17,647,097	31
TYSON FOODS INC.	`DX7AU4JMLPC7`	$43,492,439	27
CAVINESS BEEF PACKERS, LIMITED	`JMJGND1L1373`	$22,765,991	22
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC	`C47BNA8GM833`	$20,157,411	19
PERIMETER SOLUTIONS LP	`QGUQWSU5AHB4`	$15,686,576	19
PACIFIC COAST PRODUCERS	`RNUGGJVG1RK8`	$17,776,047	17
CRIDER, INC.	`VKK6BGN5BDH3`	$16,081,091	15
DEL MONTE FOODS CORPORATION II INC.	`VFHFFVVLQYF7`	$16,664,542	14

Largest share of listed recipients (calculated)

Recipient	UEI / id	Obligation (observed)	Rows (observed)	Share of listed
MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC	`WN8JFVZTBCA5`	$57,342,653	5	11.57%
TYSON FOODS INC.	`DX7AU4JMLPC7`	$43,492,439	27	8.78%
CHANNEL FISH PROCESSING CO., INC.	`HJZEDT4S8LT5`	$35,013,306	7	7.07%
HIGH LINER FOODS (USA), INCORPORATED	`ZQXGNMNBELK7`	$34,284,339	6	6.92%
WOLFTEK MISSION GROUP, LLC	`DVB4FP2XNLJ5`	$33,104,919	5	6.68%
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.	`LL22S1ELLY93`	$27,750,000	9	5.6%
AT&T ENTERPRISES, LLC	`MNALR8D818N7`	$23,500,000	4	4.74%
CAVINESS BEEF PACKERS, LIMITED	`JMJGND1L1373`	$22,765,991	22	4.59%

Top recipients — observed federal_action_obligation in this sample

Source, date, method

Coverage status: sample — SAMPLE of the first CSV member, using only R2 chunk part-00 (250 MiB). The member continues into later parts. These are not full-archive national totals.

Data collected: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Data rechecked: 2026-08-24T13:08:39Z UTC. Archive date: 2026-08-18.

Freshness: held snapshot; this page does not imply live or complete national coverage.

Source: USAspending.gov Award Data Archive · file FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806.zip · member FY2025_All_Contracts_Full_20260806_1.csv.

Method: Sum federal_action_obligation by awarding_agency_code x US fiscal year of action_date (FY starts 1 October). Award counts are distinct contract_award_unique_key values in this sample. Deobligations (negative) are included. Min-N: agency x FY page only if award_count >= 10 or |obligation| >= 10000000. Recipient lists require at least 3 transaction rows in this sample. Recipient award_count on lists is transaction rows, labelled as such.

Rows used: 833150 money records. Amounts are US dollars. All percentages use this loaded sample only.

Derived from USAspending.gov (U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service). U.S. government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. 105). This site is not the official USAspending search and is not endorsed by Treasury or OMB.

Compose a report (good slice) · bad slice · PDF most-dollars

Questions this page can answer

Read the money with its boundaries intact

What does the amount represent?

It is the summed federal contract obligation observed in the labelled USAspending sample and period—not a complete government-spending total.

Who awarded and received it?

Use agency names, recipient identifiers, fiscal year and transaction counts together; names alone can merge unrelated entities.

Can two figures be compared?

Only compare figures built from the same sample, period and measure, with the record count visible.

What should I check next?

Open USAspending for the current complete record before relying on a figure.